Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C E-car.

On June 20, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car on June 12:37, 2016, and proceeded along three-lanes from the 2nd side of the death zone, where the three-lane Do road near D at the time of influence, along with three-lanes from the 2nd side of the death zone.

At the same time, the Fchip XG car driven by the victim E (43) was in the atmosphere of a signal signal, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to ensure safety distance, to ensure the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of operation to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the above part of the passenger car by negligence, which led to the above part of the passenger car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt fat, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, the Defendant escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the injured party by immediately stopping a vehicle owned by the victim, even though it was damaged to ensure that the repair cost is equivalent to KRW 588,883.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A fact-finding survey report and evidence and photographs of each traffic accident scene;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Written estimate;

1. Each investigation report [the defendant and his defense counsel did not have the victim's location due to the accident of this case, and did not have the criminal intent of escape because he was unaware of the accident of this case, and did not fall under the measures not to be taken

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the following facts are the following facts, namely, that the damaged vehicle stops, and the Defendant’s vehicle was shocked, that the victim left the vehicle from the vehicle after shock, and that the Defendant installed the window of the Defendant’s vehicle after shock.