logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2021.02.04 2020노1172
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

Reasons

1. The sentence of the lower court (two years’ imprisonment without prison labor) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Determination as to the Defendant’s unfair argument on the sentencing of the sentencing of the Defendant was made by driving the franchise at a speed of 134 km per hour on an expressway where the Defendant was at a speed of 134 km on the side, and then driving the set-off of the marina car which was set on the side, and driving it on the side, resulting in the Defendant’s death of the victim E (hereinafter “the Deceased”), who is the driver of the set-off car, for about six weeks of the set-off car, and caused the death of the passenger, who was a passenger of the set-off car (hereinafter “the Deceased”), and the Defendant’s death of the passenger who was on the set-off of the set-off car at the set-off of the set-off car caused the Defendant’s violation of the duty of care, the degree of injury to the victim, the degree of injury to the deceased, the deceased’s death, especially the result of the deceased’s death, and the Defendant’s defense counsel at the top of the collision.

The argument is asserted.

Defendant

In addition, the court below asserted that the deceased was only a vehicle at the time of the collision, and the court below rejected the defendant's and defense counsel's assertion by properly explaining the acts No. 18 and No. 7 of the 4th page No. 18 of the judgment of the court below, and closely comparing the judgment of the court below with the records, it is reasonable to view that the deceased was within MT car and left the vehicle due to the collision. Thus, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and this part of the defendant and defense counsel's assertion is not accepted). However, the defendant shows his attitude of in-depth reflection, and all of the crimes of this case are recognized, and the victims are victims.

arrow