logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.02.13 2018나21882
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s grounds for appeal cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are different from the allegations in the judgment of the court of first instance. As such, the witness G testified that “I do not know about the name of KRW 60 million paid by the company outside the lawsuit to Defendant B,” and ② the fact that I prepared a statement (Evidence A 28) similar thereto and delivered it to the Plaintiff is recognized. However, even if the above facts of recognition and evidence submitted to the court of first instance were neglected, the recognition of facts in the judgment of the court of first instance and the judgment are justifiable.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow