logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.29 2013노1344
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Erroring facts about the gist of the grounds for appeal (the defendant did not inflict an injury on the victim, and rather was assaulted by the victim), and unfair sentencing. 2. The judgment of this court

A. In light of the difference between the first instance court and the appellate court’s method of evaluating the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court in light of the content of the first instance court’s judgment and the evidence duly examined by the first instance court, or the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court is clearly erroneous in light of the evidence examination conducted by the first instance court and the evidence duly examined by the first instance court, except in exceptional cases where it is deemed that maintaining the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance is considerably unreasonable in full view of the evidence examination and the additional evidence examination conducted by the time of closing argument at the appellate court, the appellate court should not reverse without permission the first instance court’s determination on the grounds that the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court is different from the appellate court’s determination (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Do5313, Jun. 14, 2012).

In the instant case where it is difficult to view that maintaining the judgment of the first instance court is considerably unfair even if the result of an additional examination of evidence was conducted by the time the arguments in the trial or by the time the arguments in the trial are concluded, the first instance court's decision which found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged is acceptable based on such evidence, and it is difficult to see that there is an error of mistake of facts affecting the judgment, and it is difficult

B. As to the assertion of unfair sentencing, it is reasonable.

arrow