A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 04:20 on July 9, 2014, the Defendant: (a) voluntarily flowed with the Defendant’s shape D and father E in the Gyeongginam Police Station located in B at the Namyang-si, Namyang-si; (b) went back to the police box while drinking; and (c) talked with the Defendant’s equipment, such as computer, etc., “I am late to handle the instant case; (d) I am talked with F, etc., who was aware of the developments leading up to the occurrence of the instant case, “F, etc., who was unable to go home from the said F, and failed to go home, and keep the said F, and prevented him from going back to the police box after putting the Defendant’s arms, putting the Defendant’s arms, spiting him, etc., and interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer and the police officer, etc., thereby interfering with the investigation and execution of duties of the said F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police officer with F;

1. Statement made to F and G by the police;

1. Application of investigative reports (report on telephone communications of victim police officers) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 136 (1) of the Selection of Punishment Act (to select imprisonment with prison labor, taking into consideration the following: (a) the nature of the crime is considerably poor, such as spiting or spiting the face of a police officer; (b) a police officer who has proposed him/her as part of the performance of his/her official duties files a complaint against him/her as a

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the suspension of execution shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that there is no history of criminal punishment, other than the suspension of indictment, and the circumstances, details, age, etc. of the crime in this case);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] (decision of sentence] and six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution;