logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 11. 09. 선고 2017두55121 판결
(심리불속행) 주식이 명의신탁되었음이 밝혀진 이상 명의신탁자를 특정하여 밝힐 필요 없이 증여세를 부과할 수 있음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-37941 ( December 25, 2017)

Case Number of the previous trial

16-608 ( October 07, 2016), 201.

Title

(Trial Incompetence) Unless it is revealed that shares were held in title trust, gift tax may be imposed without specifying the title truster.

Summary

(Summary) If it is found that shares were held in title trust to a title trustee, the tax authority may levy gift tax pursuant to the constructive provision on title trust donation on the basis thereof, and there is no need to specify the title truster as the grounds for disposition.

Related statutes

Article 45-2 (Presumption of Donation of Title Trust Property)

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal (to the extent of supplement in case of any statement in the statement in the statement not timely filed) were examined. However, the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal or are deemed groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per

arrow