Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant used the “D” in the “C” following the Internet portal site, and the victim E (the age of 24) used the “B” and “G” respectively.

1. 피고인은 2013. 1. 19. 14:31경 대전 동구 H 자신의 주거지에서 카페 게시판에 접속하여 닉네임 ‘I’가 게시한 “F 좀 또라이 끼가 있는 듯 애가”라는 제목의 글에 “내 말이 그거임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 존나 미래를 보나”라고 댓글을 달아 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. At around 14:43 on the same day, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by posting the title “F is, i.e., ‘I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

3. 피고인은 같은 날 14:51경 같은 장소에서 카페 게시판에 접속하여 “원래 채팅하는 사람들은 좀 꽁기한 거 있으면 다 캡쳐하고 그래 ㅋㅋㅋ”라는 제목으로 “아니면 F 쟤만 저런건가, 대체 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 와 정신력 쩐다 캐치캐치, 캐치 날캐치”라는 내용을 게시하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant is a primary offender and reflects the sentencing, there are circumstances to consider that there was a disturbance in carpets due to the victims' mistakes, and that there was a direct crime in the atmosphere, and that there was almost a similar act with the defendant.