1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is the Plaintiff’s KRW 8,00,000 and 5% per annum from January 19, 2012 to January 21, 2014.

1. Determination as to Plaintiff A’s principal claim against the Defendant

A. From May 1, 2008 to October 23, 2011, Plaintiff A and the Defendant prepared a statement of performance (Evidence 1) stating that “The Defendant bears half of each of the card prices settlement dates,” with the Plaintiff, and thus, Plaintiff A’s assertion that the Defendant should pay half of the national card price of 41,050,945 won to Plaintiff A from May 1, 2008 to October 23, 201. At the time of signing the signature at the lower end, the Defendant stated in the statement of performance in advance that “I will not attend the other male and drinking place.” On March 3, 2008, the Defendant did not take the right to travel abroad through an Internet meeting, but did not take the right to travel back to the same day, and that “I will not take the right to directly alter the card price of 1,050,000 won.”

The submission or delivery of the original, original, or certified copy shall be deemed to be the original, original, or certified copy. Thus, the submission of evidence by only a simple copy shall not be deemed to be the original, original, or certified copy, and shall, in principle, be unlawful as a matter of principle, since there is no dispute over the existence of the original, which is the same content, and the authenticity of the establishment of the original. However, even in the case of such copy, if there is no accuracy, there is no objection from the other party as to the substitution of the original, the submission of the copy shall be allowed as the waiver or loss of the right of books under the Civil Procedure Act, and the submission by only the copy shall be allowed. However, there is a dispute