Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving a car in CSpo-type.
On April 24, 2017, the Defendant driven the above-mentioned vehicle around 07:10 on April 24, 2017, and turned to the left at an irregular speed from the 1st apartment room to the sloping distance.
There are three-distance crossings that have not been supported by traffic control using yellow on-and-off signal, and there are two-lanes of victim E driving New F. F. F. L., who is left left at two-lanes, so a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system, verify career safety, and prevent the occurrence of accidents.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and contacted the left-hand turn from the occupational negligence of passing through the safety zone, and the left-hand turn from the front side of the above new bus bus vehicle in front of the Defendant’s driving, and the front part of the car in front of the right-hand side of the vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures such as destroying unexpected repair costs, such as the color side of the left side of the damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence, and also checking the situation of the accident.
2. Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act provide that when an article is damaged due to traffic, such as driving of a vehicle, etc., a driver, etc. shall promptly take necessary measures, such as removal of obstacles caused by a traffic accident, thereby preventing and removing traffic danger and obstacles and ensuring safe and smooth traffic, thereby ensuring the safe and smooth flow of traffic. In such cases, measures to be taken by a driver at the site shall be appropriately taken according to the situation at the scene of the accident, such as the details of the accident and the degree and degree of the damage, and the degree of such measures shall be ordinarily required in light of a sound form.