logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.02.08 2017고정750
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of KRW 1,00,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 15, 2017, the Defendant driving a CSpo-type car at around 15:58 on January 15, 2017, and driving the CSpo-type car at a speed that cannot be seen as the light height from the surface of the Seo-gu Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to turn to the left at a speed that is difficult to see the light height, and thus, the Defendant had a duty of care to safely drive the car according to traffic signals and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeded to turn to the left while the signal is a red signal, and the victim D(23 Do) who passed the normal new signal is driving, and the front part of the car was received in the future of the car.

As a result, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim D due to the above occupational negligence by the injury to the brain resistant sugar that requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim F (V, 19 years of age) boarding the string of the car in the string of the string of the car in the string of the string of the string, and the injury to the string, tension, etc. that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and D;

1. The actual survey report and photographs related to traffic accidents;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. The signal system map;

1. The Defendant asserts that the instant accident was intentionally caused by the victim D.

On the other hand, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above, i.e., the vehicle traffic at the accident site, the defendant violated the signal at the time, and if the victim D did not wear a safety bell with the passenger at the time, it would have reduced the speed to mitigate damage at the time of shock. According to the accident video CD, such trace is not found, the degree of damage of the damaged vehicle is not easy, and the victim D did not turn to the left at the investigative agency and the court.

arrow