beta
Text
1. The Defendant: 48,247,582 won to Plaintiff A and 5% per annum from July 16, 2014 to September 7, 2016.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. C is a person running textile sales business from March 2013 to D, and around December 30, 2012 and around June 30, 2013, one building, two building, and three buildings from among the buildings listed in the separate sheet, which are owned by Plaintiff A from Plaintiff A, are marked as one building, two building, and three buildings from among the buildings listed in the separate sheet, which are owned by Plaintiff A, but the parties are referred to as A Dong, B Dong, and C Dong for convenience.
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant building,” and one building was leased from “A” and two buildings, respectively, and used the instant building as the original storage warehouse.
C entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff as above, and the name under the lease agreement was the Plaintiff B, the former denied.
B. On April 17, 2013, Plaintiff B entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant with respect to the goods stored in the building A and the goods stored therein; on July 25, 2013, the location of the insurance subject matter of the foregoing insurance contract changed from the building A to B Dong building; on August 1, 2013, Plaintiff B entered into an insurance contract with respect to the goods stored in the building A and the goods stored in the building B, and eventually, the following insurance contracts were concluded:
(hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant insurance contract”). B EF G H H in the foregoing insurance contract
C. On August 31, 2013, a fire occurred in the Dong building B, and the building B was destroyed and partially destroyed among the three buildings listed in the Adong and the attached list (hereinafter “Cdong building”) (hereinafter “instant fire accident”), and the fibers stored in the Bdong building were discharged.
[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The judgment of the plaintiff B as to the claim of this case was destroyed or damaged by the fibers which were kept in custody of the building of this case due to the fire accident of this case, and further, the plaintiff B destroyed or damaged the fibers.