Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 27, 2017, the Defendant reported to the police on the fact that the victim C was at the time of the Defendant, who was a related party, and the victim reported to the police, using the fact that “the fact was “the document was prepared as if the victim made a third party scambling in the Jeju-gu, Seoul-do,” and that “the fact was prepared as if the third party scambling the land in the Jeju-do, the third party scambling the money from the injured party,” and there is no agreement on the victim’s cell phone with the cell phone to bring the money from the injured party.

(p) Services shall be provided to the State, and shall be made available to the State's Jeju Tax Office.

By tax evasion, “the text message is sent to the victim on the next 12:27 following day,” the 2nd written map map of “The victim on the 12:27th page,” which was the subject of the document forgery, does not lead to a disguised and excessive appearance, such as drawing up the scam on theme of the scambling. It is so much known that the scam is too blind about the disguised fraud.

B. The agreement on a monthly wage of 3 months shall also spread to the other day.

We think well and see the answer.

The recording file shall have a recording file.

The term "the transmission of the text message is hot, and the victim attempted to receive money from the person suffering from drinking, but the victim refused to do so.

In this regard, the defendant attempted to receive property by threatening the victim, but he attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on text conversations;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 352 and 350 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the amount of the fine shall be partially reduced by taking into account the following: (a) the Defendant’s acknowledgement of the instant crime and reflects his mistake; (b) there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine; and (c) the commission of the crime to be committed is about an attempted crime.