beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and three months, Defendant B's imprisonment with prison labor of four months, Defendant C's imprisonment with prison labor of eight months and Defendant D.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2013dan650] Defendant A was sentenced to two years of suspended execution for one year for violating the Automobile Management Act at the Daegu District Court on August 29, 2014.
9.6 The judgment became final and conclusive.
Defendant
A in collusion with E, with the intention of deceiving the capital company as if he actually purchased the vehicle without purchasing the vehicle, and the defendant A recruited the borrower by filing a false application for a vehicle installment financing with the capital capital company, and the defendant A decided to play the role of receiving the loan by filing an application for a loan with the capital capital company through P, which is engaged in the installment financial agency business of the defendant A with respect to the person who has been recruited by the defendant.
1. Defendants A, B, and B of the joint criminal conduct of Defendants A and B conspired with E, and around February 25, 201, Defendant B sent documents to obtain vehicle installment loans, such as a loan application, to Defendant A at the coffee shop located in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon. Defendant A again delivered the documents delivered from Defendant B to E., and Defendant A submitted the relevant documents, such as B, upon applying for a loan from the E office located in Yanan City, on February 24, 2011, at the E office located in Yananan-si, the submission of B’s loan application and other related documents, and “B would cause B to obtain vehicle loan to purchase a vehicle in the form of a vehicle in the form of Qbenz in 206,” and it received KRW 49,80,000 under the name of the P Bank in the name of the P Bank (R) from the victim.
However, the facts are that Defendant B was not the actual purchaser of the passenger car at the event, and thus, Defendant B was not the object of the automobile installment financing.
As a result, Defendant A and B acquired another’s property in collusion with E.
2. Defendant A and E co-principaled Defendant A in collusion with E, and Defendant A in an French site around February 201, at around 201, receive documents, such as a written application for a loan, from E.