Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, and by imprisonment for six months, respectively.

However, against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

On October 1, 2018, the Defendants drinking alcohol at the “Eju” store located in Chungcheongnam-gun, U.S. D, and then called Defendant B’s residence on the F car owned by Defendant B (hereinafter “instant car”) and moved to the dwelling of Defendant A located in the G in the G of Chungcheongnam-gun, U.S. G.

1. On October 1, 2018, Defendant B driven the instant vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 400 meters from the road front of the “Ejuk” store located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, North Korea, to the “I” in the same H, and without obtaining a driver’s license in the state of alcohol level of about 0.086% from the 400-meter section to the road in the same H.

2. Defendant A, as described in paragraph (1), was driving the instant car on behalf of the Defendant, as the B, did not know well about the geographical part of the car.

Therefore, the Defendant driven the instant vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.185% from the 2km section from the front of the “I” road located in the G in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do to the front of the same militaryJ, around 19:40 on October 1, 2018, while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 2km alcohol concentration of 0.185%.

3. The Defendants: (a) while getting on and moving the instant vehicle as described in Paragraph (2), discovered at around 50 meters prior to the J of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, the Defendants at around 19:50 on October 1, 2018 that police officers control drinking driving.

Accordingly, although Defendant A stopped the instant vehicle and moved it to the rear seat, Defendant A discovered that the instant vehicle is parked on the road and was under the control of drinking driving from a police officer on the water.

After taking a drinking test, the Defendants decided that the police officer “a person whose level of drinking is light” would cause him/her to be a driver, but the police officer refused to take a drinking test, and moved to a nearby public seat.

Defendant

B decided that Defendant C “I would not have a grix because the grix had its driver’s license suspended,” and Defendant C had “I would not have a grix because the grix had its license suspended level.”