A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

excessive one (No. 1) seized shall be confiscated.

Criminal facts

[2017 Highest 225]

1. On January 19, 2017, the Defendant assaulted and injured the Defendant on January 19, 2017, in front of the original shelter located in his/her permanent residence from around 13:50 on January 19, 2017, on the ground that he/she recommended a victim C (the victim C (the victim of 48 years of age) who was drinking alcohol to drink and drink and drink as she would drink, the Defendant was “J” in the charges of the victim C who was drinking while drinking alcohol. However, according to the witness J’s legal statement, the Defendant can be recognized as “C”.

The victim D (56 years old) who was drinking together in the side and was under drinking together with the victim D(56 years old) was released from the defendant, and the victim D(56 years old) was able to take the face of the victim D due to drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim C and inflicted injury on the victim D by the number of days of treatment.

2. The Defendant who interfered with his/her business on March 7, 2017: (a) from around 17:40 on March 7, 2017 to from around 18:43 on the same day, was “18:23 around the facts charged”; however, according to the video of GPC room, the Defendant’s business obstruction can be deemed as terminated by “18:43 around the day.”

In the “GPC room” operated by the victim F in the second floor of the building E permanent residence, the CCTV was previously changed to the victim’s CCTV in relation to the insult case occurred in the “HPC room” operated by the victim in another place, and the victim’s defect that “the victim was unable to store only three days and only three months have passed since only three months have passed since the victim was punished,” and the victim’s defect that “the victim did not store it;

Whether it takes place under law

“Irrely, Irrely, Irrely:

Gambae,

It was difficult to avoid disturbance by stating "the destruction of death."

The defendant continued to receive a request from the injured person, and the police officer who received a report from the injured person was called out of the locking time, and again after going out of the locking time, the injured person was able to take a bath to the injured person, and he was at the same time.