logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고단1657
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On April 11, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the support of Suwon Friwon, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on April 19, 2018.

[Criminal facts]

1. On August 21, 2017, the Defendant, at around 23:29, received food equivalent to KRW 15,300,00 for the PC room usage fee from the “DPC room” operated by a person who was damaged by the damage in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, the Defendant, even if using the PC room, finished the use of the PC in spite of no intent or ability to pay the price, and was provided by the victim until around 10:50 on the following day by deceiving the victim as if he would have paid the price, and received food equivalent to KRW 10,600 in total.

As above, the Defendant had acquired financial benefits equivalent to 25,900 won in total by deceiving the victim.

2. On August 22, 2017, the Defendant, against the victim E, was provided with services equivalent to KRW 2,000 for the PC room usage charges until 13:56 on August 22, 2017, in the “GPC room” operated by the victim of the damage in the U.S. F., the Defendant, even if using the PC room, finished the use of the PC in spite of no intent or ability to pay the price, and was provided with food, etc. totaling KRW 4,800,00.

As a result, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired a total of 6,800 won pecuniary benefit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, the current status of personal confinement, and reporting on the result of confirmation of minor convictions;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. On-site photographs and paperless records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each statement;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;

1. The first sentence of Article 37 of the Criminal Act to treat concurrent crimes: Provided, That the first sentence of Article 39 (1) shall be applicable;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant with the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the same.

arrow