1. The Defendant’s KRW 25,585,600 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from May 12, 2010 to July 24, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 12, 2010, the Plaintiff heard that the Plaintiff had an urinium in another hospital, and applied the urinology of the Defendant hospital to the urinology.

The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital shall be the same year.

3. 26. CT inspection finds, as a result of the CT inspection, species on the left-side part, and the same year.

4. 13. Along with the computer scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sc

Accordingly, the plaintiff was expected to undergo the religious dynasium at the defendant hospital.

B. On May 12, 2010, the Defendant hospital’s urology and medical professionals performed the mas excition to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant surgery”). At the time of the instant surgery, the masss were linked to the salk that was cut back from the salk to the salk. At the time of the instant surgery, the sals were cut off in the shape of the 3 cm adjacent to the salk to the salk. The salk was very easy to salk, and the sals were removed after the salk was cut.

On the other hand, on May 14, 2010, the Defendant Hospital pathology and medical professionals determined the Plaintiff’s religious life as the chwannoma.

C. From May 13, 2010, the day following the instant surgery, the Plaintiff appealed to the left-hand end and the compactacy, and the department of rehabilitation and medicine at the Defendant Hospital determined that the sedisis was completely damaged (explosioned) as a result of the pre-examination of the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 3 through 6, Evidence No. 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) If the result of the court’s entrustment of medical record appraisal to the Samsung Seoul Hospital Head is added to the above evidence, the following facts can be acknowledged.

㈎ 원고의 종양은 등근육 뒤에서 줄기와 연결되어 있었고, 주변과의 유착은 거의 없었으며, 박리가 매우 쉽게 되었다.

In addition, there was no opinion that the Plaintiff’s species are connected with the Maternalism, or that the Maternalism or Maternalism is being fluored.

㈏ 피고 병원 비뇨기과 의료진은 2010....