logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.23 2013가합31033
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiffs and the plaintiff Gap's successor's claims are all dismissed.

2. Of the litigation costs, the Plaintiffs and Defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Plaintiff A is the F Hospital run by the Defendant on September 17, 2010 (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) The Plaintiff’s successor to the Plaintiff is a juristic person that received pension benefits for old age or death of the citizens under the National Pension Act. The Plaintiff’s wife, the Plaintiff C, and D are children of Plaintiff A, and the Plaintiff’s successor to the Plaintiff is a juristic person that received pension benefits for old age or death of the citizens under the National Pension Act.

B. On July 5, 2010, while the Plaintiff A was subject to tracking observation on the training of the dynasium in the dynasium diagnosis conducted on July 5, 2010, in order to undergo a close examination, the Plaintiff A applied to the Defendant Hospital on July 16, 2010 in order to undergo a close examination, and the Plaintiff A provided the Plaintiff’s treatment for the dynasium CT and dynasium test.

C. According to the above-mentioned examination’s prescription on August 9, 2010, Plaintiff A applied to the Defendant Hospital to undergo the MaTRI test, and as a result, on August 16, 2010, each of the above tests reported on August 16, 2010 showed an opinion of 10.7cm of the size of 10.7cm, which is placed on the left-hand side, and G provided medical treatment at H’s request, explained that Plaintiff A needs to undergo an operation, and the said Plaintiff was to undergo an operation on September 17, 2010.

1) On September 16, 2010, Plaintiff A was hospitalized at Defendant Hospital to undergo an operation on September 16, 2010, and from September 12:47 to 15:55 on the following day (anesthesia hours from around 11:46 on the same day to from around 15:55 on the same day) the Plaintiff A performed an operation and performed an operation to remove species. The Plaintiff A performed an operation to perform an operation and perform an operation to perform an dump the dump sump sump sump sump sump sump sump

(2) At first, the Defendant hospital medical personnel was in charge of the operation by using the laves, and the laves of the laves of the laves of the laves of the laves of the laves of the laves of the laves of the laves of the laves.

arrow