Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 105,398,528 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from July 3, 2014 to May 26, 2017.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The Defendant is a vehicle owned by a legal entity operated by the Defendant’s mother on July 3, 2014, which was parked in the form of obstructing the progress of the vehicle from Plaintiff’s daily driving around 17:40.
The term "seaing vehicle" is called "seaing vehicle"
2) The Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul, where the said vehicle was parked, was the front road of the B-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) . The ground for recognition . The fact that there is no dispute, Gap Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the entire pleadings.
B. According to the above facts, the defendant, as a driver of a sea-going vehicle, caused the accident of this case due to negligence of neglecting his duty of care to drive by accurately examining the situation of the direction of the accident. Thus, according to the evidence adopted above, the road in which the accident of this case occurred is a narrow side of the vehicle to the extent that the two costs of the vehicle can easily compete with each other. The defendant sent the above vehicle to another place in order to park a sea-going vehicle. The plaintiff was shocked in the course of driving the vehicle again. At the time of the next step, the plaintiff did not look at the opposite direction and look at the road center, and it can be recognized that the accident of this case was caused by the accident of this case. In light of the above facts acknowledged, the plaintiff also knew in advance about the situation that the vehicle was moving to another place, the plaintiff's accident of this case or the accident of this case.