1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The court's explanation of this part of the liability for damages is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each of the corresponding items of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated monthly, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

It shall be rejected that the parties' arguments are not separately explained.

[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap evidence 6, Eul evidence 7, Eul evidence 9, the result of the physical examination commission to the director of the court of first instance on the director of the Seoul Estol University, the result of the fact inquiry on the director of the court of first instance and the director of the Seoul Estol University of the court of first instance, and the result of fact inquiry on the director of the Dongjakl fire station of the court of first instance, the result of fact inquiry, significant fact, experience, the purport of the whole argument, and the actual income personal information: The same shall apply to the "basic matters" column

The Plaintiff’s name of the term of lease is at least 70% of the normal person, and the date of expiration of the name shall be considered as July 4, 2034.

The actual income and operating period: the actual urban daily wage, the 22th day of operation, and the 60 years of age, as the plaintiff seeks, the actual results of the disability - the left-hand paralysis due to the cerebral surgery, etc., and the degree of contribution 50% of the Mabrid disability assessment table 37% of the two parts of the Mabrid disability assessment table 3-C (vocational coefficient 5) and the permanent disability, the defendant claims that the plaintiff's disability was at least 70% of the contribution rate since the plaintiff's disability was caused by self-explosion, but 1) the plaintiff appealed two copies of the accident to the first responder called after the accident of this case after the accident of this case.