(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.12.17 2017고정593

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.12.17 2017고정593

절도

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with a single fluore red fluor, which was located on the D customer satisfaction center, with cash 600,000 won owned by the D customer satisfaction center; (b) on July 15, 2017, the Defendant committed a theft with a single fluorial red fluor, which was located on the D customer satisfaction center.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each photograph (the defendant and his/her defense counsel brought the defendant on the wall with his/her will of theft, but immediately put him/her in a shot box of conscience, and did not steal 60,000 won in cash inside the wall;

The argument is asserted.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., (i) the victim received consolation benefits from the persons hospitalized in the investigation agency and the court for the previous traffic accident of this case, and (ii) the victim was placed in the wall to use cash of KRW 600,000 (No. 50,000) on the day of the instant case in the engine engine exchange.

In full view of the following facts: (a) there is consistently stated that the above statement is not likely to be false; (b) CCTV images: (c) the victim was placed in the wall and did not own the wall until the Defendant saw the wall; and (d) even based on the Defendant’s statement, the Defendant brought the wall to the wall and immediately put it into the wall; (c) there is no possibility that others would bring the cash in the wall; and (d) the head of the post in which the Defendant was placed in the wall does not have to open the wall again from the date of the instant party to the seat of the police officer; and (e) there is no risk that other persons, other than the wall, might not open the wall again; and (e) there is a structure that makes it difficult for them to open. In full view of the fact that the victim’s wall was 600,000 won in cash within the wall, and the charges of theft by the Defendant are sufficiently recognized.

The defendant and defense counsel shall not be accepted.

The laws and regulations;

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 논산지원 2015.04.03 2014고단444

-인천지방법원 2016.07.06 2016노912

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.26 2016노3898

-인천지방법원 2016.07.21 2015고정3062

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.10.31 2017고단738