(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.10.31 2017고단738

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.10.31 2017고단738

절도

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 27, 2016, around 22:20 on November 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim E-owned land located on D gas stations located in Gwangju-si; (b) 50,000 won in cash; and (c) 50,000 won in cash located therein. The summary of the evidence was stolen.

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement about witness E and F;

1. E statements;

1. On-site CCTV reports (on-site CCTV confirmation), each CCTV-cap photograph, credit card receipts, and tea-book [the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant merely carried the defendant's lock with the mind that he would put him in a brush.

The fact that the defendant puts the wall on the wellbox following the date is recognized.

However, in full view of the aforementioned evidence, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged as follows: (a) the Defendant discovered that he was on the part of a gas station after leaving the gas station, and without notifying it to the staff of the gas station, promptly put him into the gas station; (b) the Defendant, following the following, did not return to the gas station after receiving the phone from the AB credit card company, and promising him to bring him to the gas station; and (c) the Defendant did not inform the gas station, etc. of such fact; and (c) the Defendant did not look at the her mother at the hospital and did not inform the gas station of such fact.

However, considering the fact that the Defendant’s residence was in close distance to the gas station, and that there was no notification to the gas station at all, etc., the Defendant first brought to the intention of illegal acquisition, and immediately following the following day, the Defendant was identified as the whereabouts of the gas station, and the Defendant was able to put the land in the mail box.

Appellanting that it will bring to the gas station

After words, it seems that the body is put on the wall at will and then put the wall on the wall.

Therefore, we cannot accept this part of the Defendant’s defense counsel’s assertion.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.10.24 2014고정548

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.06.16 2015고정1683

-대구지방법원 2020.09.09 2020고정91

-수원지방법원 2015.06.17 2014노6698

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.26 2016노3898