logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.07.21 2014나48462
공사대금
Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked by the plaintiff (appointed party).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 9, 201, the Daesung Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Mansung”) concluded a contract with the Defendant for the construction work of the large-scale repair of the F Hospital located in I and three parcels of land in Gangwon-do (hereinafter “instant building”) (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction work”) from the Defendant during the construction period of KRW 2,640,00,000 (including value-added tax) and from April 11, 201 to September 11, 2011.

B. On May 16, 201, the network G, which is engaged in telecommunications and fire fighting construction business (hereinafter “the network”), was awarded a subcontract for the electrical construction of the instant construction (hereinafter “instant electrical construction”) among the instant construction, with the contract price of KRW 390,50,00 (including value-added tax) and the construction period from May 16, 201 to August 30, 201, respectively.

C. On September 1, 2011, the Deceased concluded a contract for manufacturing and supplying the water distribution team necessary for the instant electrical construction with H to KRW 76,670,00 (including value-added tax).

On July 20, 2013, the Deceased died, and the designated parties C and D (hereinafter “designated parties”) indicated in the separate list of the deceased’s children, who are the spouse of the deceased, succeeded to the deceased’s property.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 5, Gap evidence 8, Eul evidence 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's ground of claim

A. The Defendant is an original contract for the instant construction, and thus, as the subcontractor for the instant electrical construction is obligated to pay KRW 225,710,000 to the Deceased, the subcontractor, and as the Plaintiff and the designated parties inherited the Deceased, the Defendant is obligated to pay the above amount of money and damages for delay to the Plaintiff and the designated parties in accordance with their respective statutory shares in inheritance.

B. On February 24, 2012, the Defendant against the Deceased for the instant electrical construction costs H.

arrow