logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.09.28 2016고단3320
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Victims (States);

A. On March 2015, the defrauded of accommodation charges, the Defendant, at the “E” hotel in the victim’s operation at the time of the mid-to-mid-to-mid-to-date, the Defendant entered into a contract for the victim’s president F to exhibit art works with the victim’s president and entered into a contract for the use of the art works, and the Defendant falsely concluded that “F will pay accommodation charges to the hotel at the end of each month.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had to borrow or sell money from others at a high price in order to pay accommodation expenses due to the absence of certain income or assets. However, even though it was difficult to expect sale of a work exhibited and exhibited without any agreement to borrow money, the Defendant had to pay accommodation expenses in a normal manner without notifying F of such circumstance.

The Defendant, as such, deceiving F, and from April 2, 2015, from F to F, the same year.

6. By September 6, 200, by providing guest rooms as shown in the annexed list of crimes, and acquiring pecuniary benefits of KRW 9,650,000 in total.

B. Around April 25, 2015, the Defendant acquired the borrowed money by fraud, saying, at the above hotel around April 25, 2015, the Defendant concluded that “F would lend money to F only KRW 2-3,000,000,000,000 as it is urgently needed, and immediately return it.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money with no means to do so.

The Defendant, by deceiving F as such, received KRW 3 million from F to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (H) in the name of G for the purpose of borrowing money from F.

(c)

On May 2, 2015, the Defendant, by fraud, made a false statement to F that “I will pay the price if I will provide a cover of 100 customers in Seoul.”

However, the defendant is obliged to pay the cost even if he has received meals due to the lack of such capabilities as above.

arrow