logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2020.06.22 2020고단556
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, from May 20, 2019 to October 2019, was accommodated in the condition that the Defendant paid accommodation charges of KRW 400,000 per month to “Dn” operated by the victim C in the game B.

Around November 2019, the Defendant stated that “DD’s accommodation is difficult to pay accommodation expenses in advance because there is no money in advance to the victim.” On the other hand, the Defendant stated that “Around November 2019, the Defendant would allow the payment of accommodation expenses to continue to be made.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay accommodation charges in a normal manner even if he did not have certain income or assets at the time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, did not pay accommodation charges from November 2019 to January 202, 202, even though he was provided with the guest rooms by the said female, thereby acquiring pecuniary profits equivalent to KRW 680,000 in total, as well as accommodation charges.

2. Around January 22, 2020, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant operation by force for about 20 minutes, such as drinking and eating at “G” restaurant operated by the Gyeonggi F, which is operated by the victim E (n, 64 years of age), who is requested by the victim to pay the drinking value, and the victim was able to take a bath with a large amount of sound, and the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant operation by force for about 20 minutes.

3. At around 21:50 on January 9, 2020, the Defendant: (a) sought alcohol in a 'J’ restaurant operated by the victim H (ma, 64 years of age) in Gyeonggi-do; and (b) ordered the instant restaurant to do so; (c) however, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s operation of the restaurant by force for about 10 minutes, such as: (a) the victim’s obscencing staff on the name of the said restaurant that “it is impossible to drink during business hours,” and (b) the victim’s obscencing staff from the said cafeteria.

b)a summary of the evidence;

arrow