Defendants are not guilty. The summary of each judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. The following facts are acknowledged according to the progress of the instant case’s records.

A. The Defendants were prosecuted as the facts charged of violating the Public Law Act (hereinafter “case subject to review”). On December 1, 1976, this Court found the Defendants guilty of both the facts charged against the Defendants on December 1, 1976, sentenced Defendant A to a three-year suspended sentence of five years and suspension of qualification, three years of suspended sentence and suspension of qualification, and two years of suspended sentence of three years of imprisonment, and two years of suspension of qualification, respectively (hereinafter “the judgment subject to review”), and the judgment subject to review was finalized around that time.

B. On June 17, 2014, the Defendants filed a petition for a new trial as to the judgment subject to a new trial with this Court 2014 Inventory 1, and this court rendered a decision of commencing a new trial on January 26, 2015, and the said decision became final and conclusive around that time.

2. The indictment of this case is as shown in the annexed indictment of this case.

3. The summary of the Defendants and the defense counsel’s assertion was found guilty of the facts charged against the Defendants on the premise that the Defendants and co-defendants prosecuted as co-defendants in the case subject to a new trial, on the premise that the Defendants and co-defendants in the case subject to a new trial, praises North Korea’s leader, or syponsed against North Korea’s leaders, and that H syponsed North Korea’s leader and was imprisoned by North Korea’s leader, and that the judgment of

In addition, the testimony evidence against H and the Defendants, etc. adopted as evidence of guilt in the judgment subject to retrial, are prepared in a state of no voluntariness by the adviser and cruel act committed in the state of illegal confinement, and all evidence to acknowledge the facts charged of this case is inadmissible.

Therefore, not guilty should be pronounced against the Defendants.

4. Determination

A. Each written statement prepared by the Defendants in the police interrogation protocol against the Defendants, and each written statement prepared by the Defendants at the police investigation stage.