Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On September 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:40 on September 27, 2014, in front of the 103-dong C Apartment 103-dong 104, the Defendant: (b) committed assault against the Defendant, such as the Defendant: (c) at the front of the 103-dong, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; and (d) at the front of the 104-dong residence, the Defendant flabed the disturbance, such as drinking and drinking in B, etc., and drinking and drinking in B, in the immediately preceding residence; and (c) the police box of the YY-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

B. The Defendant damaged the article for public use.

At the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph, there was damage to the above patrol vehicle, which is a public object, to the extent of KRW 524,920, repair cost, such as arresting a flagrant offender by F, who was arrested by F, during the process of the police box, who was dispatched to the above site with the above suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties, and burning the back of the driver's seat at the back seat of G G, resistance, and walking the back glass of the driver's seat at several times, snacker, and door.

2. At around 02:00 on the same day as indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant, at the entrance of the above apartment building 103 3-4 dong 3-4 dong 103, and the captain of the above police box, attempted to arrest a flagrant offender under the suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties, such as Paragraph (1) of this Article, f, who was responsible for the attachment of the above police box, has committed assault, such as: (a) f, who was responsible for arresting a flagrant offender; and (b) f, who was responsible for the attacking of F’s f, by taking the fransh with his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the damaged photograph, estimate, and photograph;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Articles 136(1) and 141(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act.