Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. From November 4, 2017 to February 8, 2018, Defendant A placed an advertisement for commercial sex acts on the Internet “E” website with the trade name of “D,” after having a ctel 517, 3418, and 3401, Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office Officetel 517, 3418, and 3401. The Defendant received 8 to 160,000 won from male customers who reported the advertisement and received part of the price for commercial sex acts from the male customers who contact with them, and had them do sexual sex acts with male customers, thereby engaging in commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

2. Defendant B, on January 31, 2018, had 50,000 won out of 80,000 won of the price for sexual traffic paid by customers F around 14:30 on January 31, 2018, and engaged in sexual intercourse with F, thereby engaging in sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police in relation to F and G;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of internal investigation reports (information on public relations of sexual traffic, text conversations between female employees and occupations), investigation reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reporting on sexual traffic;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.; Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc.; Article 21 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.; Article 21 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the suspended execution;

1. Protective observation and community service order (defendant A) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation (Defendant A) Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. (Defendant A);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) and the act of arranging sexual traffic is highly malicious to the society due to the commercialization of sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals. Defendant A has no reflect even though it was controlled on December 19, 2017 due to the arrangement of sexual traffic.