A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[Majority-related relationship] On January 30, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to three years and four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on December 11, 2013, and completed the execution of the final sentence on June 28, 2016 upon being sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gwangju District Court on December 11, 2013.

[2017 Highest 3226] The Defendant, on January 2017, 201, sent Samsung N100 Kara to the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the Defendant, a letter, “TX100 Kara,” which the Victim D put on the F website of the Internet EM, to the Defendant, and on the part of the Defendant, deposited money by contact with the Defendant.

Note 2

The term "" refers to the following.

However, the defendant did not have the above Samsung NX100 Kamer and received money from the injured party, even if he did not receive money from the injured party.

there was no intention or ability to act.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received 160,000 won from the victim to H account in G name on the 18:34 of the same month from the victim; and (c) obtained the remittance from the victim.

[2017 Highest 3469] The Defendant decided by J to purchase a new world department store store with an amount equivalent to KRW 300,000,000 in the market price, and had others pay the price.

On January 31, 2017, the Defendant inserted the victim K in EF car page (g7x) published by the victim K on the EF car page.

The phrase “to make a request for sale to the victim by making use of cell phone Kakao Stockholm to inform the victim of the safety transaction ID.”

3.50,000 won shall be deposited into the H bank account under the J’s name after filing an application for sale, and the State Kameras shall be sent to the Kameras.

Contact with the purport of “States”

However, the defendant thought that he would transfer the price of merchandise coupons that he would purchase to the defendant, and send the above camera even if he would receive the price from the damaged party because he did not have the above camera.

there was no intention or ability to act.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and caused the victim to do so.