logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.27 2017고합577
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

9,800,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On August 5, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon Friwon, and completed the execution of the sentence on November 30, 2016.

[2] The Defendant: (a) aware of the fact that the Defendant was unable to obtain permission to change development activities due to the revision of the law in order to build a cultural center called “D” and “F” to the victim; (b) despite the fact that there is no relationship with the public officials related to the permission to construct G viewing, the Defendant would have access to the victim and obtain permission to change the contents of the relevant public officials

The author tried to forge the relevant document as if he/she obtained permission, and to acquire money from the damaged person as if he/she purchased kumkyl tree owned by the victim at H View Green Green Project Office in H View Park.

1. On May 29, 2017, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s office located in I around 07:32, 2017, sent to J, an employee, a mobile phone Kakao Stockholm, an official document in the name of the G market called “K for new construction of a new report on construction permit (an alteration of permitted matters : 1st:K:) by affixing an official document in the name of the G market as a photograph, and directed C to prepare a second official document to be delivered to C in relation to the construction permit of D’s building.

J Accordingly, at its own house located in LBL 303 on the same day, “K Ha, Ha, [Integri G] Building permit processing notice [Attachment 2: K] by means of a computer;

2. As to the matters on which an application for a building permit was filed on a non-divided parcel outside D with a thickness, it stated that the construction permit is to be issued pursuant to Article 11 of the Building Act, and stated, “after payment of the registration license for the permission for diversion of farmland and construction development activities, time to incur a delivery of a construction permit in the construction and construction permit,” etc., and operated an image file in the name of G market [Integri G] building permit processing notice [Attachment 2] computer (K].

The defendant is above 22:27 on the same day.

arrow