logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.24 2019나998
제3자이의
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Supplementary or additional parts of the judgment of the court of first instance 【each description of evidence A through 9” in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to the “each description of evidence A through A and 11, and the testimony of Q Q’s witness at this court.”

The following shall be added to the fourth instance judgment of the first instance.

【5) The Plaintiff asserted to the effect that regarding the lease agreement (No. 5) between G, I, and R on April 12, 2018, the Plaintiff prepared a substitute lease agreement by a licensed real estate agent for a loan from a financial institution. The witness Q of this court testified to the effect that it was only a substitute lease agreement, not a direct brokerage of a lease agreement, but only a substitute lease agreement.

A person shall be appointed.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow