(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.31 2018나2045559

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.31 2018나2045559

사해행위취소

Text

1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended by this court, is modified as follows.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for adding or adding the following determination as to the argument added by the defendant in this court, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or additional parts] The 3th 10th 3th 10th 3th 10th 3th 3th 10th 3th 3th 3th 1st 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 1st 3th 3

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, "The current account transaction was suspended" and "the next day was suspended."

On the five pages of the first instance judgment, the part between 18 and 18 of the instant assignment contract shall be deemed to be “the instant assignment contract concluded with respect to the claims indicated in the attached list”.

On the 8th of the first instance judgment, the “Evidence No. 6. 18, 30” of the first instance judgment is deemed to be “Evidence No. 6, 17, 30”.

The 8th judgment of the first instance court, the 12th to 14th, and 16th to 18th, "this court" shall be deemed to be "the first instance court" respectively.

In the first instance judgment, the first instance judgment’s 11th page “as of November 13, 201” is deemed to be “as of November 13, 2001.”

In the first instance court’s 17th 8th h 17th h 8th h 17th h 8th h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h g h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h,

In the judgment of the court of first instance, 18, 15, and 17, the phrase “one of the instant claims assignment contracts ought to be seen either to or to be seen during the instant claims assignment contract” shall be deemed to read “it is possible to seek the revocation of the instant claims assignment contract concerning the entire claim for the construction cost

The judgment of the court of first instance is rendered.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2020.07.03 2020누31400

-서울고등법원 2019.09.06 2019누39057

-서울고법(인천) 2019.11.15 2019나10642

-서울고등법원 2020.01.16 2019나2020700

-서울고등법원 2020.11.20.선고 2020누38357 판결