1. The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are dismissed, respectively.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 1, 1979, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on January 31, 2015 by serving as the Air Force Staff Staff, and discharged from military service on January 31, 2015.

B. On March 3, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) was selected as a staff member of base construction upon the introduction of the F16th of May 1990; (b) performed his/her duties in a poor environment such as base construction and installation preparation, equipment support, long distance of management vehicles, maintenance support, administrative support, transport operation plan; (c) performed his/her duties in a poor environment such as night work and holiday work; (d) after the establishment of the military unit, the Plaintiff was assigned as a non-commissioned officer in charge of the operation and control of the transportation unit after the establishment of the transportation unit, and was determined to be in urology in the health examination in 196 due to excessive stress in the performance of duties during transportation; and (e) was registered as a person eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that the 16th of the 16th unit, the 16th unit, the catology, the catum, the catulation, the catum surgery, and the cat.

C. On November 5, 2015, the Defendant treated the Plaintiff from 2000 to 200 to 300, the Plaintiff rendered a decision on the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation, and on the ground that there is no evidence to prove that the disease was caused by the military performance, other than the Plaintiff’s statement, and that there was no objective evidence to prove that the disease was caused due to the military performance, and that there was a diagnosis and treatment during the military service alone, it is difficult to recognize the personality of a public official, and that there is no medical causal relationship between the injury and the disease who filed the application even in consideration of the cause of the outbreak of medical information. Moreover, on the ground that there is no evidence to prove that the disease was caused due to the rapid aggravation of the natural progress due to the military performance of official duties, the Defendant rendered a decision on non-specific requirements for persons who have

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, 2, and 4.