1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 28, 1958, the Plaintiff entered the Navy and discharged from military service on January 31, 1963.

B. On May 24, 200 and February 6, 2007, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that: (a) the Plaintiff received treatment from the upper part of the inner area (cocon part, etc.) where he was on board in the Jinhae Military Hospital around October 1960; and (b) was diagnosed with the “satise and the left-hand left-hand left-hand left-hand back” due to the side effects; (c) on August 28, 2000 and March 19, 2007, the Defendant did not have objective evidence to prove that the above injury was caused during military service; and (d) on the ground that there was no causation between the Plaintiff and the person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that the causal relation with the performance of official duties is not recognized.

C. On April 17, 2014, the Plaintiff again filed an application for re-registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State or persons eligible for veteran’s compensation with respect to the Defendant, alleging that the Plaintiff, in the process of receiving treatment at a military hospital after having been injured, caused “influence on the left and left-hand side” due to the side effects of the wind suitable for injection whose term of validity has expired, but, without undergoing from time to time treatment, he/she was living in a post-confluence due to post-treatment without undergoing an operation.

The Defendant, following the resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement on August 27, 2014, constitutes a person eligible for veteran’s compensation under the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons of Distinguished Services to the State”) on the ground that “the Plaintiff was found to have been farming after being taken in the lusium at the time of the lusium in the lusium in the lusium of the previous lusium, and the specific and objective records proving the recognition of the official ability of the instant wounds are not verified, and there is no proximate causal relation between the instant wounds and the performance of official duties.”