The guilty portion in the judgment of the first instance shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

No. 1, 2, 3 of seized evidence.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) In the first instance trial, the Defendant did not forge the power of attorney of U.S. citizens, the residence and signature confirmation of U.S. citizens, the real estate sales contract, and the personal confirmation. 2) The sentencing of the first instance on the Defendant of unfair sentencing (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. In full view of the evidence of the first instance court on mistake of facts, it is recognized that the Defendant forged a certified copy and abstract of the resident registration under the name of the head of competent Dong, such as the facts charged. The first instance court found the Defendant not guilty of the forged part of public document is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts. 2) The sentencing of the first instance court on the Defendant of unfair sentencing is too uneasible

2. Determination

A. If the first instance court's judgment on the prosecutor's assertion of mistake of facts has duly adopted and examined the evidence examined by the prosecutor, the evidence submitted by the first instance court alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the defendant conspireds with C that the defendant has forged a copy of a certified copy of a resident registration under the name of the head of the Goyang-gu Goyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Dong as stated in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and thus, it is just to find the defendant not guilty of the facts of the official document of this case among the facts charged by the defendant, and there

In addition, the prosecutor's assertion is without merit, since there is no other evidence to prove additional crimes of the defendant in the trial.

B. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts is 1) The summary of the facts charged (the Defendant, along with C, in an irregular place not exceeding Cheongju on December 2, 2014, in order to complete the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Defendant with respect to 21,025 square meters of forest E in Leecheon-si, by using a verification color pen, without authority, in the seller column of the real estate sales contract, “D”, “Ycheon-si E in Gyeonggi-do”, and “4.4 billion won” in the sale price column.