logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2020.01.14 2019고단1070
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the BM7 car.

On May 9, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car at around 06:00, and turned the front of the road in front of the road that is located in the Dong-dong at the time of a macroscoping, by moving it to the right-side bank from the front side of the tunnel to the right-side bank.

A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well well, and to prevent accidents in advance by operating the steering gear and brake system accurately.

The Defendant left the scene without stopping even though the victim C&A car moved to the same way as the Defendant’s driving direction on the right side was received from the left side part of the victim C&A car in front of the left side, and left the scene as they were.

(2) The Defendant’s act of driving away from the Defendant’s vehicle to the Defendant’s act of driving away from the Defendant’s act of driving away from the Defendant’s act of driving ahead of the Defendant’s act of driving away from the Defendant’s act of driving ahead of the Defendant’s act of driving ahead of the Defendant’s SM7 vehicle, the Defendant’s act of driving away from the Defendant’s act of driving ahead of the Defendant’s act of driving ahead of the Defendant’s SM7 vehicle to the Defendant’s act of driving ahead of the instant SM7 vehicle. The Defendant’s act of driving ahead of the said SM7 vehicle to move back from the Defendant’s act of driving ahead of the Defendant’s act of driving ahead of the left side of the said SM7 vehicle. In short, the Defendant’s act of driving out from the Defendant to the left side of the said SM7 vehicle, which led to an act of driving ahead of the said vehicle to the right side part of the above SM7 vehicle (hereinafter “the second accident”). In the end, the Defendant did not immediately repair the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow