logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.11.30 2018고합82
살인미수
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be eight years of imprisonment.

No. 1 of the evidence seized by the defendant shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2018, the Defendant, at the week C located in Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, the Defendant: (a) performed alcoholic beverage with D with D; (b) had D talked with the victim E (37 years old); and (c) the Defendant, while fighting with the victim as a matter of money, told the victim to “Fsing in the future.”

At around 19:50 on the same day, the Defendant met the victim in front of the Fsing in Hongcheon-gun G, the victim's face part by drinking, and the victim's "hon" means "hon". After having a knife (13.5 cm in length) in H apartment I located in his residence, the Defendant's dwelling, and returned to the front of the Fsing and going back to the front of the victim's knife, and the part of the victim's left side and right side knife in that knife was followed once.

As a result, the Defendant attempted to kill the victim by such a method as above, but did not commit an attempted injury, etc. to the breath, which had an open room for treatment for about five weeks, to the victim ( approximately KRW 6-7 cm high in depth, approximately 4 cm high in the breath, 2 x 1 cm high between the breath and the breath, etc. in the vicinity of the 7rd galll, the breath of 4cm high in width, and the intention was not achieved.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the victim;

1. On-site photographs, records of seizure, photographs of seized articles, investigation reports (related to the degree of injury of the suspect E), investigation reports (Attachment of CCTV images installed around the site of the case), diagnostic records, investigation reports (verification of the suspect on the CCTV screen), investigation reports (verification of the suspect on the CCTV screen), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (as a result of confirmation of

1. Relevant Article 254 of the Criminal Act, Articles 250 (1) and 250 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. That the defendant did not have any intention to kill the defendant as to his/her assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act

The argument is asserted.

However, the defendant is recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court.

arrow