logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.08.23 2017나64391
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, except for the addition of the following '2. Additional Judgment' to the allegations that the plaintiff added to the defendant's counterclaim claim, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff asserts to the effect that the plaintiff's counterclaim, which was based on the premise that the defendant supplied the plaintiff with defective goods because there was a defect in the goods supplied by the defendant. However, there is no evidence to prove the plaintiff's above assertion. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of the principal lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's claim of the counterclaim of this case shall be accepted as reasonable.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow