(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.06.21 2017노3841 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.06.21 2017노3841

폭행등

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. According to the statement of D, etc. of the grounds for appeal, the court below found the defendant not guilty of this part of the facts charged despite the fact that the defendant assaults D and insultd as stated in the facts charged.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in this part 1) On November 30, 2015, the Defendant requested 5 million won for additional premium to the victim within the “I Child Care Center” operated by the victim D (V, 49 years old) located on the first floor of H apartment management office around 11:00 on November 30, 2015, but refused to do so.

The Defendant she fatd with the victim in a form opposite to each other, she fatd with a hallway, she fatd with a hallway, she continuously led the victim as the senior citizens at the place where he was damaged, and she dated 3 to 4 times with a fat within the senior citizens' body, and she sated the victim who continued to be a damaged corridor, she satd with a bat, and satd with a bat, and satd with a bat, she satd with a bat, batd with a bat, and batd with a bat at the second floor management office, and she fatd with a 5 to fatd with a bat, while making a conversation at the 2nd floor management office.

2) The Defendant

2. A. (1) In the case of paragraph (1) of the same paragraph, at the place where theJ, etc. exists for the same reason as the entries in the same paragraph within the elderly premises, the victim will attend as of the day before the death of the victim in the Do Do Do Ba as of the day of death.

“The victim was openly insulting by speaking in a large voice.”

B. In full view of the following circumstances admitted by the evidence, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of this part of the facts charged on the ground that the evidence alone, which was presented by the prosecutor, was not proven as beyond a reasonable doubt, and thus, constitutes a case without proof of criminal facts, based on the provision of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

1. K’s written statements and J as shown in the facts charged among the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2013.12.19 2013노1969

-광주지방법원 2013.08.27 2013고정1011

-창원지방법원 2016.11.02 2016고단1918

-수원지방법원 2013.10.17 2013고정2213

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.07.02 2014고정227