1. The defendant's refusal of reappointment against the plaintiff A on August 31, 1998, and the disposition against the plaintiff B on August 31, 1994.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant, such as the status of the parties, is a school foundation that establishes and operates a G University (former name before the alteration: G junior college; hereinafter “Defendant University”).

The Plaintiffs were appointed as full-time instructors at Defendant University as listed below and the contract period was terminated on each date stated in the following table.

Promotion of appointment of departments in charge of the date of appointment of the name, expiration date of appointment of the departments, or appointment of a associate professor on April 1, 1998 in the Korean language on March 1, 1998;

B. (1) The plaintiff A consented to the appointment of fixed-term appointment of the plaintiff A on August 6, 1998 by the teachers' personnel committee of the defendant on each of the above dispositions rejecting the reappointment of the plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as "each of the above dispositions rejecting the reappointment").

However, on August 10, 1998, the Defendant’s board of directors decided to refuse the Plaintiff’s re-election against the Plaintiff A on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s board of directors decided to abolish the subjects of culture from the year 1999 to the year of 199, would not contribute to the development of curriculum and other schools.”

(2) Plaintiff B: The Defendant’s teachers’ personnel committee consented to the appointment of Plaintiff B as a fixed-term worker on July 21, 1994.

However, on August 16, 1994, the board of directors of the defendant must arrange one teacher inevitably due to the reduction of the hours of the class of cultural language, and since the plaintiff A has 300% research performance as a doctoral degree holder, the plaintiff A is reappointed, and the plaintiff B is refused to be reappointed.

'The decision was made'.

(iii).