The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person who actually operated the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C, D and E with the fourth floor.

around February 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the victim G management office (hereinafter “H”) office located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “H”); (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant established the E Company; and (d) the Victim’s brand.

J. Along with K K, I would like to undertake a golf construction project in 50 weeks of the establishment of 50 weeks of the I, thereby making a false statement to the effect that “I supply a golf store equivalent to KRW 120 million.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was tried on a fraudulent case that he was unable to pay the clothes at that time, but the amount of the yet-paid debt reaches approximately KRW 2.3 billion, and even if he was supplied with clothing from the damaged person due to financial difficulties at that time, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the amount normally.

On March 12, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, entered into a supply contract with the victim, stating that “the total amount of KRW 123,373,80,00 of the raw materials of clothing, such as golf d,500 to golf d, mersh, Coina, shall be supplied until April 20, 2015, and the payment shall be 50% as of the end of the following month after the end of the following month, and 50% of the remaining balance shall be paid at the end of the following month” from the victim’s office, which was issued from April 21, 2015 a letter of significance equivalent to the total of KRW 123,373,80, including golf d,50, total amount of KRW 4,500, from the victim.

2. According to the records, the following facts can be acknowledged.

(1) Around January 2015, D entered into a consignment contract with K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”), which entered the entire production of the clothing produced by D into a place designated by K, which entered into a consignment contract for the goods entered into by K, and the clothing was sold by K monopoly and prohibited from selling it.

(2) On March 12, 2015, D entered into a contract for the processing with H. The content is that D produces and supplies products within the supply period set by D.