logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.11.13 2018누54516
보상금등지급신청기각결정취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts to be filled or added below, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

At the bottom of the second part of the judgment of the first instance, 5 e.g. “Defendant” (except for each part) shall be deleted.

At the fourth bottom of the judgment of the first instance, 4 '21' shall be added to '22' below.

The 5th and bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be filled with the "witness" of the 5th and the "secondness" of the court of first instance as the "witness of the court of first instance."

2. At the bottom of the 5th judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added:

(B) Even if the deceased was called to the I unit with X, Q did not state that Q had received education by leading X, and Q stated to the effect that X did not have received education with the deceased and other persons including the deceased, or that Q was removed with North Korea, and Q also stated to the effect that the deceased was presumed to have received education with the deceased and other persons. There seems to be little that Q would have been presumed to have reached the North Korea along with X through a talk about X itself and a debate in Hri community). The five pages of the judgment of the first instance and the five pages of the judgment of the first instance, “this law” was put into the “court of the first instance.”

The following shall be added to the 6th of the judgment of the first instance, “Insufficient” of the 6th of the judgment:

[M] At the time of the investigation on February 25, 2010 (Evidence A No. 17), the following contents are added to the Defendant 6th five pages of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “Defendant 6”).

P was first applied for compensation with the deceased, including the deceased, but it was recognized that Huri, including the deceased, did not North Korea, and the P own compensation is paid.

arrow