logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원정읍지원 2015.09.30 2015가합88
연고권확인
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From 201 to 201 to 2014, the Governor of Jeollabuk-do sold a parcel of land that has a relative in accordance with the Management Regulations of the desolate River site (hereinafter “the Management Regulations of this case”) to the upper half of the year 201 to the upper half of the year 2014, the Republic of Korea, as a river site in the Hando Dam, was transferred to Jeollabuk-do by disuse the river site outside the dam zone among the land managed as a State-owned land.

B. 1) The Jeollabuk-do’s respective real estate listed in the separate sheet from the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “each land of this case”) shall be the Republic of Korea’s respective real estate (hereinafter “each land of this case”), and the “instant land” by the sequence

Of the instant lands, on February 3, 1986 with respect to the land Nos. 6, 7, 9, 17, and 17, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of the concession made on February 3, 1986, on the land No. 1 through 5, 10, and 16 on the ground of the gratuitous concession made on January 22, 2000. Meanwhile, the instant land No. 8 is a state-owned land. 2) The Defendant recognized the relative under Article 7(1) of the instant Management Regulations as the Plaintiff on the land Nos. 10 through 14 on August 31, 201, and requested the Plaintiff to purchase the said land on or around November 6, 2001.

As the Plaintiff did not comply with the above request for purchase, the Defendant, around June 10, 2003, demanded the Plaintiff to purchase each of the above lands again, and notified the Plaintiff that the land was sold through an open competitive bidding as stipulated in Article 17 of the Management Rules for the land for which the sales contract was not made by July 30, 2003.

3. The defendant around August 31, 2004 of this case No. 1.

arrow