1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. From 201 to 201 to 2014, the Governor of Jeollabuk-do sold a piece of land with a relative in accordance with Article 78 of the River Act and the regulations on the management of desolate River Sites in Jeollabuk-do (hereinafter “the management regulations of this case”) to the first half of the first half of the first half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the second half of the year. The Republic of Korea, as the river site of the second half of the second half of the river site, was transferred to Jeollabuk-do by disuse the river site other than the dam area among the lands managed as the site of the second half of the second half of the second half of the river site of the second half of the second half of the second half of the year. The Defendant and the

The contents of the above River Act and the related provisions of this case are as shown in the attached Table.

B. 1) The Jeollabuk-do’s respective real estate listed in the separate sheet from the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “each land of this case”) is the “land of this case” according to the sequence.

Of the instant lands, for the purpose of concession on February 3, 1986 with respect to the land Nos. 6, 7, 9, 17, and 17, each of the instant lands was completed on the ground of gratuitous concession from January 22, 2000 and around the concession date. Meanwhile, the instant land No. 8 is a state-owned land. 2) The Defendant recognized the relative under Article 7(1) of the instant management regulations as the Plaintiff on August 31, 2001, and requested the purchase from the Plaintiff on November 6, 2001.

As the plaintiff did not comply with the above request for purchase, the defendant requested the plaintiff to purchase each of the above lands again on or around June 10, 2003, and the sale contract was not concluded by July 30, 2003, the management regulations of this case.