Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. As to the summary of the reasons for appeal (two years of imprisonment), the defendant asserts that the defendant is too uncomparably and unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that it is too uncompared and unreasonable.

2. The court below appears to have taken into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant was in a state of mental disability at the time when he committed the crime of this case (the trial record 167 pages) and such circumstances were mostly considered in the court below, on June 24, 2013 due to obstruction of performance of official duties, the victim Z, Q, and E wanted to have a preference against each defendant (the trial record 200, 241, 321 pages), and that the president of the Nfera who committed the crime of damaging public goods also sought a favor by the defendant seriously (the court record 313 pages). The defendant appears to have been in a state of mental disability at the time when he committed the crime of this case (the trial record 167 pages). The defendant was a repeated offender whose execution of the sentence was completed on June 24, 2013, and the victim was committed on five days thereafter, and the victim's family relation was committed during the same kind of assault and behavior of the defendant, and the remaining circumstances of the crime of this case.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.