All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the sentence of the lower court (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The defendants were found to have committed the crime of this case in order to raise the fund for the brupt hospital of the mother-child. However, all of these circumstances were considered in the court below. The defendants committed the crime of this case 5 and 6 times since they were sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime, such as the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and even though there was a past record of the protective custody disposition, they committed the crime of this case again. The crimes of this case are planned crimes, and most of the larceny committed the theft crimes are planned crimes, and they committed the larceny crimes while taking advantage of the vehicle with another vehicle number plate attached to the stolen air, and they committed the larceny crimes. The number and period of the larceny crimes of this case, the amount of damage is small, the damage area is broad, the victims and the circumstances leading to the occurrence of the crime of this case, the age and contents of the crime of this case, family relation, occupation and behavior of the defendants, occupation, etc. are not considered to be too unfair sentence.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.