logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.11.29 2018가단203138
사해행위취소
Text

1. On September 201, 2016, the Defendant filed for registration with the Incheon District Court on the real estate stated in the attached list to the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Upon the judgment of the court against E from May 19, 2016, the Plaintiffs filed an application with E for the determination of the amount of litigation costs related to the instant case (Seoul Family Court 2016 businessz30890), and on October 13, 2016, “The amount of litigation costs that E shall reimburse to the Plaintiffs is KRW 3,108,167,” which was dismissed by the Seoul Family Court 2016B30122, and became final and conclusive on August 17, 2017.”

B. On June 14, 2017, Plaintiff A filed a lawsuit against Plaintiff E for damages (Seoul Western District Court 2017Kadan20567) and rendered a judgment on June 14, 2017 that “E shall pay Plaintiff A KRW 42,276,00 and damages for delay.” The judgment became final and conclusive on July 29, 2017.

C. Meanwhile, on September 12, 2016, regarding the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”), E is the same month to the Defendant, who is the mother.

9. On December 4, 2017, the registration of ownership transfer claim was completed on the basis of trade reservation, and the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 27, 2017.

[Ground of Recognition] In the absence of dispute, each entry of Gap 1 through 3, 9 through 11, 14 through 16, 20 through 24 (including virtual numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the F Bank, G Bank, H Bank, I Bank, and J Bank, as a result of each order to submit financial transaction information to the F Bank, G Bank, H Bank, I Bank and J Bank, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The following circumstances revealed in the facts of recognition and the evidence mentioned above, namely, E lost a claim, such as damages filed against the plaintiffs, and the judgment became final and conclusive, as long as the judgment became final and conclusive, the mother of the instant real estate was registered in the future of the defendant, who is the mother of the instant real estate, as well as the registration of the right to claim ownership transfer has been completed, and the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs A and the plaintiffs E.

arrow