Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ joint criminal acts (Interference with their duties) committed on January 5, 2018 at the point of “D” located in Hanam-si, Hannam-si, and met the horses from the victim E operating the said main points to “Man-do Order D, Man-do, Man-do,” and committed a disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as: (a) Hah-do, Hah-do, and Hah-do, and Hah-doing the victim with the said main points; and (b) Hah-do, the Defendants committed a disturbance for about 30 minutes.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. Defendant A: (a) around January 5, 2018, at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 1; (b) around 20:35, at the 112 report and sent back, Defendant A’s slope G’s sloping box affiliated with the Southern Police Station Fast that was called out after receiving a 112 report prevents the Defendant; and (c) Defendant A’s s

See the word “ ............., the chest part of the said slope G was pushed down one time by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

3. Defendant B, at the same time and at the same place as above 2, the police officers attempted to arrest Defendant A who was sexually arrested Defendant B, took a bath to the chief of the police box affiliated with the F police box of the Southern Police Station, and carried out one time the chest part of Defendant B’s chest by hand.

On January 5, 2018, the Defendant continued to sit in the atmosphere with the Defendant who was arrested as a flagrant offender of H inside the F police box located at the Hannam-si, Hannam-si on January 5, 2018, and caused the Defendant to sit in the atmosphere, and her hand pushed the chest part of the above Ha.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 reporting operations and legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. E statements;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (a) of the same Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the same Act, and Article 136(1) (a) of the same Act, and Article 314(2) of the same Act, and Article 314 of the Criminal Act, and Article 314(2) of the Act,