1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

Defendant

A 10,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from A.

Defendant

A above.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A has been elected as a member of the FF Council through the third local election on June 13, 2002, and has been continuously elected as a member of the FF Council (three-party) member of the FF Council until now, and is in charge of the vice-chairperson of the FF Council.

G is a local public official who served as the head of H Eup/Myeon from August 10, 2008 to the present date, while I served as the head of H Eup/Myeon farming village in the H Eup/Myeon office from February 15, 2003 to the present date, and from January 2009, J is a local public official who served as the head of H Eup/Eup office from January 2009 to the present date.

On the other hand, Defendant B is a local public official working as a local public official of the FGun Office from 1974 and promoted to the administrative division in 1990, and he was working as the FGun Office Construction Disaster Management and the administrative division in 2007.

1. In the FF group of victims of occupational breach of trust, a small low temperature storage shop has been implementing a project to provide subsidies for installation of small low temperature storages to promote the increase of income through the improvement of the commercial quality of agricultural products and the adjustment of shipment by distributing small low temperature storages to cultivated farmers, such as small fruit trees and flowerss with a size of less than two times

A. On March 207, Defendant A and I co-principaled with the duties of examining and selecting a person eligible to receive subsidies for the installation of small low temperature storage facilities at the H-Eup office located in K located in K prior to the early police officer and notifying the F-Gun Forest Department of eco-friendly agriculture.

Defendant

At the time of H Eup office around March 2007, A solicited I to grant subsidies to L who is not a farmer as a subcontractor, as a subcontractor at the time of H Eup office.

Accordingly, I accepted the above solicitation and notified L to the F-Gun Environment-Friendly Agriculture Department around March 9, 2007, despite the opposition of H-Eup M at the time, despite being aware that L was not eligible for subsidization due to the violation of the above duties, L acquired eligibility for payment of KRW 3750,000 of the installation subsidy from F-Gun's temporary border.

Accordingly, Defendant A is the defendant.