logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2012.11.28 2012고단435
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, Defendant B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, Defendant E, F, and G, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants A, B, C, D, and E are persons operating I who are distributors of agricultural machinery; Defendant B is the representative director of J farming association; Defendant C is the representative director of K farming association; Defendant D is the representative director of L farming association; and Defendant E is the representative director of M branch.

Defendant

A and B: (a) the Defendants implemented the “Support Project for Manufacturing Equipment of the Connections with Hung-gun” in order to expand the growing area of Hung-gun’s feed crops in connection with Hung-gun; (b) around May 2009, when Hung-si purchases research equipment to reduce the burden of management expenses on Hung-gun’s construction machinery and equipment, the Hung-si purchased research equipment and equipment to pay a certain amount of equity capital (hereinafter “self-payment”) if Hung-si purchased the equipment and equipment to reduce the burden of management expenses, the Defendants prepared a false document as if he did not pay the self-payment; and (c) conspired to receive the subsidy on the basis of this.

The Defendants: (a) at the Gun Office on May 20, 2009, the Defendants: (b) did not pay KRW 28,320,000 to Defendant B, while Defendant B purchased research equipment equivalent to KRW 118,320,00 from Defendant A’s operated by Defendant B; (c) did not pay KRW 28,320,000 to Defendant B; (d) even if Defendant B submitted a copy of the account passbook in the name of Defendant B deposited in KRW 30,000,000, the Defendants prepared the documents, such as a false application for subsidies, and submitted them to the staff in charge where the names of the Gun were not known, from the victim; and (e) submitted them to the staff in charge where the name of Defendant B was not known.

6. A subsidy of KRW 90,000,000 in total, each of the 45,000,000 won in the NongHyup account in Defendant B’s name (OF 45,000,000, local expenses, KRW 45,000,000) was granted.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the Defendant to receive KRW 90,000,000.

arrow